Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
От | Jesper Pedersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bd754e7c-24da-7f9a-7e25-47383d2f4b71@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amul, On 09/28/2017 05:56 AM, amul sul wrote: > It does not really do the partition pruning via constraint exclusion and I don't > think anyone is going to use the remainder in the where condition to fetch > data and hash partitioning is not meant for that. > > But I am sure that we could solve this problem using your and Beena's work > toward faster partition pruning[1] and Runtime Partition Pruning[2]. > > Will think on this changes if it is required for the pruning feature. > Could you rebase on latest master ? Best regards, Jesper -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: