Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bcf45c82-16b4-16a0-91cc-001c03c03ce3@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/02/2020 03:56, Vik Fearing wrote: > On 06/02/2020 03:38, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the >>>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes. >>>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think >>>> 4 votes is a broad consensus. >>> >>> Fair point. I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed >>> on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions? >> >> Indeed, still I am not sure what kind of number is enough to define a >> large consensus. Vik, could you start a new thread on -general? > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3d8e809b-fc26-87c5-55ac-616a98d2b0be%40postgresfriends.org The vote here was 6 yeas and 1 nay (85.7%) with 2 abstentions. The poll on pgsql-general has gone stale with 19 yeas and 2 nays (90.5%). My poll on Twitter has ended with 33 yeas and 4 nays (89.2%). https://twitter.com/pg_xocolatl/status/1225258876527874048 There is a little bit of overlap within those three groups but among the minuscule percentage of our users that responded, the result is overwhelmingly in favor of this change. -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: