Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bcc38e7d-4a98-7a90-222d-35f198587d59@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/17/2017 05:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 8/17/17 09:21, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> The RFC doesn't say anything about salt >> length, but the one example in it uses a 16 byte string as the salt. >> That's more or less equal to the current default of 12 raw bytes, after >> base64-encoding. > > The example is > > S: r=rOprNGfwEbeRWgbNEkqO%hvYDpWUa2RaTCAfuxFIlj)hNlF$k0, > s=W22ZaJ0SNY7soEsUEjb6gQ==,i=4096 > > That salt is 24 characters and 16 raw bytes. Ah, I see, that's from the SCRAM-SHA-256 spec. I was looking at the example in the original SCRAM-SHA-1 spec: S: r=fyko+d2lbbFgONRv9qkxdawL3rfcNHYJY1ZVvWVs7j,s=QSXCR+Q6sek8bf92, i=4096 - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: