Re: Primary key gist index?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Primary key gist index? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bcb9d38a-861a-cb89-97c7-3c606b43b5a7@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Primary key gist index? (Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Primary key gist index?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 03/14/2018 06:19 AM, Jeremy Finzel wrote: > Hello! From all that I can tell, it is not possible using a btree_gist > index as a primary key. If so, why not? I have a table with this gist https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/btree-gist.html "In general, these operator classes will not outperform the equivalent standard B-tree index methods, and they lack one major feature of the standard B-tree code: the ability to enforce uniqueness." > index which truly ought to be its primary key. as_of_date is of range > date type: > > EXCLUDE USING gist (id WITH =, as_of_date WITH &&) > > Any direction here would be much appreciated. > > Right now, I am forced to create a redundant btree index UNIQUE, btree > (id, lower(as_of_date)) in order to have a primary key on the table. > > Thanks! > Jeremy -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: