Re: Field size become unlimited in union...
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Field size become unlimited in union... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bc61f14a-f42f-247f-2107-653d4f110869@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Field size become unlimited in union... (Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Field size become unlimited in union...
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/03/2016 04:28 AM, Durumdara wrote: > Hello! > > As I experienced, PGSQL changes the result field sizes to unlimited > varchar, when I passed different field size in same column of the union. > > SP.Key - varchar(100) > SP.Value - varchar(200) > > Example: > > select 'a', value from sp > union all > select key, value from sp > > > The first field is not limited to 100, it's unlimited varchar() (= Text, > Memo, CLOB). > > So PG don't use the maximal field size (100). > > > If I did cast on the field to resize to 100, the result is limited > correctly. > > > select cast('a' as varchar(100)), value from sp > union all > select key, value from sp > > > Can I force somehow to PG use the maximal size? > > Or must I know and equalize all field sizes in union? > > Or must I use temporary tables and inserts to not get this problem? See below for complete explanation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/typeconv-union-case.html 10.5. UNION, CASE, and Related Constructs > > Thanks > > Regards > dd > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: