Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bc03e76e-15d6-744e-db53-2e4417b5fe05@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-10-19 Th 02:06, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
Thanks, Peter for the comments.On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 5:13 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:On 29.08.23 09:05, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> v1-0001-Implement-jsonpath-.bigint-.integer-and-.number-m.patch
>
> This commit implements jsonpath .bigint(), .integer(), and .number()
> methods. The JSON string or a numeric value is converted to the
> bigint, int4, and numeric type representation.
A comment that applies to all of these: These add various keywords,
switch cases, documentation entries in some order. Are we happy with
that? Should we try to reorder all of that for better maintainability
or readability?Yeah, that's the better suggestion. While implementing these methods, I was confused about where to put them exactly and tried keeping them in some logical place.I think once these methods get in, we can have a follow-up patch reorganizing all of these.
I think it would be better to organize things how we want them before adding in more stuff.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: