Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bb8b90b3-af44-3520-49cf-214a5930695c@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/16/2018 05:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: >> On 02/16/2018 05:07 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> If problematic for < master users I think you'll have to restart cluster >>> with allow_system_table_mods, manually create/drop toasted column. IIRC >>> that should add a toast table even after dropping. > >> I wasn't sure if we would want to backpatch and put the manual procedure >> steps into the release notes. > > The example you give seems like pretty bad practice to me. I don't think > we should back-patch unless it's possible to trigger the problem with a > more realistic policy expression. Fair enough, but the origin of this was a real life-based complaint. > (Also, one can always work around it by putting the complicated condition > into a function, which would likely be a better idea anyway from a > maintenance standpoint.) Yes, exactly. I'm fine with not backpatching, just wanted to raise the possibility. I will push later today to HEAD (with a catalog version bump). Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: