Re: pg_upgrade: when the --old-bindir requires "additional" $libdir/plugins?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade: when the --old-bindir requires "additional" $libdir/plugins? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bb5687ea-735f-357a-b195-7ca93c31ad91@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade: when the --old-bindir requires "additional" $libdir/ plugins? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade: when the --old-bindir requires "additional" $libdir/ plugins?
Re: pg_upgrade: when the --old-bindir requires "additional" $libdir/ plugins? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 04/18/2018 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> writes: >> . and it seems like the hstore.so was somewhat intimately integrated into >> OP's database so the '/usr/bin/pg_dump --schema-only --binary-upgrade >> --format=custom' called through 'pg_upgrade' failed with: >> pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: could not access file >> "$libdir/hstore": No such file or directory >> Which means that the dump from old datadir, with old server (without >> hstore.so packaged) failed. But playing with hstore.so a bit, the upgrade >> always worked smoothly for me even without the "old" hstore.so > > Hi Pavel, > > There are certainly plenty of reasons why extension .so's might be needed > during pg_dump, even in a binary-upgrade situation. The first example > that comes to mind is that an hstore-type constant appearing in a view > definition would require hstore_out() to be invoked while dumping the view > definition. I am obviously missing something. If the old server was using hstore in a database how could hstore.so could be accessible to it but not pg_dump? > > I don't remember anymore whether I'd set up the postgresql-update package > to include the contrib modules for the old server version. If I didn't, > it was an oversight :-(. > > regards, tom lane > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: