Re: [HACKERS] pgrowlocks relkind check
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgrowlocks relkind check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bb3d9024-ba7e-a06e-b619-d9933ceb9168@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pgrowlocks relkind check (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pgrowlocks relkind check
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/12/17 21:10, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2017/06/13 0:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 4/24/17 21:22, Amit Langote wrote: >>>>> create extension pgrowlocks; >>>>> create view one as select 1; >>>>> select pgrowlocks('one'); >>>>> -- ERROR: could not open file "base/68730/68748": No such file or directory >>>>> >>>>> With the attached patch: >>>>> >>>>> select pgrowlocks('one'); >>>>> ERROR: "one" is not a table, index, materialized view, sequence, or TOAST >>>>> table > FWIW, patch seems simple enough to be committed into 10, unless I am > missing something. > > Rebased one attached. According to CheckValidRowMarkRel() in execMain.c, we don't allow row locking in sequences, toast tables, and materialized views. This is not quite the same as what your patch wants to do. I suppose we could stillallow reading the relation, and it won't ever showanything interesting. What do you think? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: