Re: Proposal: Remove regress-python3-mangle.mk
От | Yury Zhuravlev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Remove regress-python3-mangle.mk |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bb11d177-a606-4361-a76b-1674ffb9c5b0@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Remove regress-python3-mangle.mk (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Remove regress-python3-mangle.mk
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch wrote: > Considering we have 2756 lines of Python test SQL and just thirteen lines of > sed to mangle them, the current method is scaling nicely. What pitfalls hides this approach? Convert python2 code to python3 it is really bad practice. >I may not understand that second sentence. We have multiple buildfarm members >verifying the python2 case and multiple members verifying the python3 case. I wrote about special python3 features what not testing today. We testing Python3 as subset of Python2. >The PL/Python implementation does not view them as different languages; But it is really different languages. If we do not want to have two different code base, then it is necessary to use than this: https://pythonhosted.org/six/ The license allows us to copy this code into postgres. Or use standart Python tool 2to3: https://docs.python.org/2/library/2to3.html Thanks. -- Yury Zhuravlev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: