Re: Plans for 8.2?
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Plans for 8.2? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | bac4ad84fea66f03d441900778e74081@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Plans for 8.2? (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Plans for 8.2?
Re: Plans for 8.2? |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Easy everyone. Let's not bite the newcomers too hard here. > 2. Define "endorse". Does that mean "in the backend"? So > everyone has to pay the performance penalty even though they won't > all use it? Even though no other database system makes you make that > compromise? I would presume that at least packaged with PG (in the contrib section) would be a good start. A prominent, east to find link to Slony on the website would help too. I just did a test to see what comes up when I typed "replication" in the search box at postgresql.org. Got a 503 error. We really need to work on that. Bad enough we don't use Postgres to do the searching. I'd better stop here before I start ranting myself. I didn't expect that 503 error when I started this letter. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200601131734 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFDyCt4vJuQZxSWSsgRAkXZAJ4hvwlENtOxGPh1x+vNu3++izLQCQCgsqCa rW1MUxPxDqYFbdgontgxuwk= =ZlIa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: