Re: remove more archiving overhead

On 7/7/22 14:22, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:51:42AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> +    library to ensure that it indeed does not overwrite an existing file.  When
>> +    a pre-existing file is encountered, the archive library may return
>> +    <literal>true</literal> if the WAL file has identical contents to the
>> +    pre-existing archive.  Alternatively, the archive library can return
> 
> This should likely say something about ensuring the pre-existing file is
> persisted to disk before returning true.

Agreed.

Also, I'd prefer to remove "indeed" from this sentence (yes, I see that 
was in the original text):

+    library to ensure that it indeed does not overwrite an existing

Regards,
-David