Re: The tragedy of SQL
От | Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The tragedy of SQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b9f247c1-05a8-d4ab-b692-c3fea69b9e36@simkorp.com.br обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The tragedy of SQL (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Em 15/09/2021 21:55, Adrian Klaver escreveu: > On 9/15/21 5:30 PM, FWS Neil wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 15, 2021, at 2:44 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com >>> <mailto:mmoncure@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> I think you ought to recognize that many people on this list make >>> money directly from managing that complexity :-). >>> >> >> I did not intend to disparage anyone. People, including myself, make >> money when they provide value and there is certainly value here. >> >> But, I am not sure I understand your inference. Are you saying (and >> I am not implying you are) that PostgreSQL does not progress in line >> with the original SQL goals of simplifying data access because people >> are making money off of the current complexity? >> > > I'm going to say Merlin was being one part sarcastic, one part saying > people may not want to bite the hand that feeds them. > > As to SQL, if Postgres wants to maintain it's goal of hewing to the > SQL standard then what progress it came make is determined by the SQL > standards committee. I love the fact that PostgreSQL keep in sync with SQL standard. I love SQL as it is (and I came from a world with Cobol, Clipper and Dbase, and other 4GL etc tools). Also, I teach SQL to my junior employees, and they love it once they fully compreehends - even stop defending the NoSQL hype. At other side, I would see no objection if someone else would implement another language on top of PostgreSQL engine. Just my 2c. Regards, Edson
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: