Re: Properly handle OOM death?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Properly handle OOM death? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b9b8d1df-08e2-2863-a2d6-48aec9e457f7@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Properly handle OOM death? (Israel Brewster <ijbrewster@alaska.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Properly handle OOM death?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/13/23 14:50, Israel Brewster wrote: > Looks like V2: > > root@novarupta:~# stat -fc %T /sys/fs/cgroup/ > cgroup2fs Interesting -- it does indeed look like you are using cgroup v2 So the file you want to look at in that case is: 8<----------- cat /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/system-postgresql.slice/postgresql@14.service/memory.max 4294967296 cat /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/system-postgresql.slice/postgresql@14.service/memory.high 3221225472 8<----------- If the value comes back as "max" it means no limit is set. In this example (on my Linux Mint machine with a custom systemd unit file) I have memory.max set to 4G and memory.high set to 3G. The value of memory.max determines when the OOM killer will strike. The value of memory.high will determine when the kernel goes into aggressive memory reclaim (trying to avoid memory.max and thus an OOM kill). The corresponding/relevant systemd unit file parameters are: 8<----------- MemoryAccounting=yes MemoryHigh=3G MemoryMax=4G 8<----------- There are other ways that memory.max may get set, but it seems most likely that the systemd unit file is doing it (if it is in fact set). -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: