Re: automatically generating node support functions
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b9acf63c-6693-d87c-f010-ca8ad502a39f@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: automatically generating node support functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: automatically generating node support functions
Re: automatically generating node support functions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.07.22 22:46, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> [ v7-0001-Automatically-generate-node-support-functions.patch ] > > I have gone through this and made some proposed changes (attached), I have included those. > and I think it is almost committable. There is one nasty problem > we need a solution to, which is that pgindent is not at all on board > with this idea of attaching node attrs to typedefs. It pushes them > to the next line, like this: > > @@ -691,7 +709,8 @@ > (rel)->reloptkind == RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL || \ > (rel)->reloptkind == RELOPT_OTHER_UPPER_REL) > > -typedef struct RelOptInfo pg_node_attr(no_copy_equal, no_read) > +typedef struct RelOptInfo > +pg_node_attr(no_copy_equal, no_read) > { > NodeTag type; I have found that putting the attributes at the end of the struct definition, right before the semicolon, works, so I have changed it that way. (This is also where a gcc __attribute__() would go, so it seems reasonable.) The attached patch is stable under pgindent. Finally, I have updated src/backend/nodes/README a bit. I realize I've been confused various times about when a catversion change is required when changing nodes. (I think the bump in 251154bebe was probably not needed.) I have tried to put that in the README. This could perhaps be expanded. I think for this present patch, I would do a catversion bump, just to be sure, in case some of the printed node fields are different now. It was also my plan to remove the #ifdef OBSOLETE sections in a separate commit right after, just to be clear. Final thoughts?
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: