Re: [HACKERS] kqueue
От | Matteo Beccati |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] kqueue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b9605a7f-4d1f-d794-1141-cb769e34ba47@beccati.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] kqueue (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] kqueue
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/01/2020 17:06, Tom Lane wrote: > Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com> writes: >> On 21/01/2020 02:06, Thomas Munro wrote: >>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGJAC4Oqao%3DqforhNey20J8CiG2R%3DoBPqvfR0vOJrFysGw%40mail.gmail.com > >> I had a NetBSD 8.0 VM lying around and I gave the patch a spin on latest >> master. >> With the kqueue patch, a pgbench -c basically hangs the whole postgres >> instance. Not sure if it's a kernel issue, HyperVM issue o what, but >> when it hangs, I can't even kill -9 the postgres processes or get the VM >> to properly shutdown. The same doesn't happen, of course, with vanilla >> postgres. > > I'm a bit confused about what you are testing --- the kqueue patch > as per this thread, or that plus the WaitLatch refactorizations in > the other thread you point to above? my bad, I tested the v14 patch attached to the email. The quoted url was just above the patch name in the email client and somehow my brain thought I was quoting the v14 patch name. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: