Re: pgsql: Respect permissions within logical replication.
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Respect permissions within logical replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b920ffde-8d6e-d795-394e-aea53e4e910a@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Respect permissions within logical replication. (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 1/8/22 04:25, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:22:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> 2) crake fails perl-check >> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2022-01-08%2002%3A47%3A26 >> >> All the failures are the same, because of the shape of the subroutine >> definitions: >> Jan 07 21:53:04 ./src/test/subscription/t/027_nosuperuser.pl: >> Subroutine prototypes used at line 13, column 1. See page 194 of >> PBP. ([Subroutines::ProhibitSubroutinePrototypes] Severity: 5) > This issue is just caused by the way the subroutines are defined, > meaning that the attached cools down pgperlcritic. Any objections if > I apply that to cool down crake? Jeff, if you wish to do so, please > feel free of course. Please do this. Subroutine prototypes should only be used in very restricted circumstances in Perl. I can't recall when I've ever needed them. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: