Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
От | Mike Rylander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spoofing as the postmaster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b918cf3d0712221051o5afb9e00v559fcc95e81996ae@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spoofing as the postmaster (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Re: Spoofing as the postmaster |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 22, 2007 1:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > Wouldn't SSL work over Unix-domain sockets as well? The API only deals with > > file descriptors. > > Hmm ... we've always thought of SSL as being primarily comm security > and thus useless on a Unix socket, but the mutual authentication aspect > could come in handy as an answer for this type of threat. Anyone want > to try this and see if it really works or not? > > Does OpenSSL have a mode where it only does mutual auth and not > encryption? The encryption would be wasted cycles in this scenario, > so being able to turn it off would be nice. > miker@whirly:~$ openssl ciphers -v 'NULL' NULL-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=None Mac=SHA1 NULL-MD5 SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=None Mac=MD5 I see no way to turn off the message digest, but maybe that's just an added benefit. --miker
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: