Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces
От | Mike Rylander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b918cf3d0703221434w349e5ab8t650737c478b1edd1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML
namespaces
Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/22/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I was hoping that we're deprecating contrib/xml2, so I wouldn't add more > >> features to it. > > > Author states: > > >> I understand that XML support is planned and at least partially > >> implemented for 8.3, but many production instances will be unable (or, > >> in fact, unwilling) to upgrade to 8.3 for quite some time. Because > >> this patch is completely backward compatible it can (theoretically) be > >> included in future 8.1 and 8.2 releases, and for those of us that need > >> more full XML support in the short term the upgrade of a contrib > >> module is probably a very viable option -- it is for me, anyway. > > Well, it's not going to be put in future 8.1 or 8.2 releases, so the > above argument is not a reason to include it now. What the author > should do if he wants to offer a new feature for past release branches > is to put up a project on pgfoundry. > > regards, tom lane > Hmm.. OK. Well, thank you all for clarifying that. I thought (perhaps only hoped?) that the bar was lower for contrib than for core as far as features go, but it seems that assumption is incorrect. I'll look at starting a pgfoundry project soon. A related question, however: Will the XML features being included in 8.3 support namespace prefix registration? If not, handling arbitrary XML via XPath that includes unprefixed (default) namespaces (for me that is the majority of the XML I deal with, and no, I can't change that) will have exactly the same problems using the new mechanisms as with the current xml2 contrib module. I ask because, based on the design emails I've seen on -hackers, nothing surrounding explicit support for said issue jumped out at me. Thanks again. -- Mike Rylander mrylander@gmail.com GPLS -- PINES Development Database Developer http://open-ils.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: