Re: Foreign key joins revisited
От | Joel Jacobson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Foreign key joins revisited |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b8f75897-5bed-4056-90bb-2c2d2e3f9491@www.fastmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Foreign key joins revisited ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Foreign key joins revisited
Re: Foreign key joins revisited |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021, at 19:33, Sascha Kuhl wrote:
> The Syntax is great. Which language does it come from. I consider it not german. But I understand it mathematically.
> Great extension.
It doesn't come from any language. But I've seen similar features in ORMs, such as the jOOQ Java project. [1]
Actually, I think jOOQ's "ON KEY" terminology might be something to take inspiration from.
In jOOQ, it's a Java method .onKey(), but I think it would look nice in SQL too:
LEFT JOIN role r ON KEY p.permission_role_id_fkey
I think it would be nice if we could simply using dot "." instead of "->" or whatever.
I think it should be possible since "ON KEY" would avoid any ambiguity in how to interpret what comes after.
We would know "permission_role_id_fkey" is a foreign key name and not a column.
Or is the grammar too sensitive for such creativity?
/Joel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: