Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b8a0b834-c936-d135-df66-cc119ceb8205@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/10/23 09:57, Amit Langote wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 15:51 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net > <mailto:david@pgmasters.net>> wrote: > On 6/9/23 19:14, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > If you see "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)", > > it's dead certain that relid refers to a view, so you could just wire > > in that knowledge. > > Yeah, that's a good trick. Even so, I wonder why relkind is not set > when > relid is set? > > I too have been thinking that setting relkind might be a good idea, even > if only as a crosscheck that only view relations can look like that in > the range table. +1. Even better if we can do it for PG16. Regards, -David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: