Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?
Дата
Msg-id b89df4d1-7627-4489-8199-34a7e1e20e15@wi3ck.info
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 5/13/21 6:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>               Bumping the version in the commit that changes
> things is not optional, because if you don't do that then you'll
> probably burn some other developer also working on HEAD.  So
> I don't want people thinking they can skip this because it was
> done at the beginning of the development cycle.

And we make sure this is done how?


Regards, Jan

-- 
Jan Wieck
Postgres User since 1994



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Borisov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OOM in spgist insert
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables