Re: Online enabling of checksums
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b87e9f3f-a647-571d-2168-bc5d48e1ff5b@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online enabling of checksums (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online enabling of checksums
Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/31/2018 12:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Hi!, >> >> Thanks for reviewing, I’ve updated the patch with the above mentioned incorrect >> linkends as well as fixed the comments you made in a previous review. >> >> The CF-builder-bot is red, but it’s because it’s trying to apply the already >> committed patch which is in the attached datallowconn thread. > I think checksumhelper_cost_delay should be checksum_helper_cost_delay. > ^ > > Is "helper" the right word? Based on other terminology within the postgresql.conf should it be "checksum_worker_cost_delay"? JD > -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc *** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. *** PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: