Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b838aa95-da25-6b51-dafa-856e51aee62c@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/06/15 17:53, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Amit Langote wrote: >>> Both of the above comments are not related to the bug that is being fixed, but >>> they apply to the same code where the bug exists. So instead of fixing it >>> twice, may be we should expand the scope of this work to cover other >>> refactoring needed in this area. That might save us some rebasing and commits. >> >> Are you saying that the patch posted on that thread should be brought over >> and discussed here? > > Not the whole patch, but that one particular comment, which applies to > the existing code in ATExecAttachPartition(). If we fix the existing > code in ATExecAttachPartition(), the refactoring patch there will > inherit it when rebased. Yes, I too meant only the refactoring patch, which I see as patch 0001 in the series of patches that Jeevan posted with the following message: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOgcT0NeR%3D%2BTMRTw6oq_5WrJF%2B_xG91k_nGUub29Lnv5-qmQHw%40mail.gmail.com Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: