Re: Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() to accept localized names
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() to accept localized names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b7f37b12-3c59-e5d7-0e59-535a117d259b@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() to accept localized names (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() to accept localized names
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-01-24 12:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2020-Jan-24, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote: > >> There is an open patch that will make the normalization functionality user >> visible [1]. So, if a user can call to_date(normalize('01 ŞUB 2010'), 'DD >> TMMON YYYY') I would vote to drop the normalization logic inside this patch >> altogether. > > I was reading the SQL standard on this point, and it says this (4.2.8 > Universal character sets): > > An SQL-implementation may assume that all UCS strings are normalized > in one of [Unicode normalization forms]. > > which seems to agree with what you're saying. When you interact with glibc locale functions, you essentially have to assume that everything is in NFC. When using ICU locale functions (which we don't here, but just for the sake of argument), then I would expect that ICU does appropriate normalization itself when I call icu_what_month_is_this(string) returns int. So I think it is appropriate to not deal with normalization in this patch. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: