Re: polite request about syntax
От | Ricardo Malafaia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: polite request about syntax |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b7c5d37f0609150835h5de4d62ey7e5ee273e008bc31@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: polite request about syntax (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: polite request about syntax
Re: polite request about syntax Re: polite request about syntax Re: polite request about syntax |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
well, ain't that surprising to see so many open-source developers living in denial and sugestions to RTFM rather than actually coping wth the problem? are you to be taken seriously? As a C programmer, I'm in the same league as most of you guys, so while i can really contribute code and my talk is cheap, it's the best i can do: bug you with feature requests. So: On 9/15/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > Where is the mention of either of these on the CREATE FUNCTION page? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-createfunction.html > And anyway, what is your actual complaint? my complaint is that, like i said, "timestamp with time zone" is no good substitute for a simple "datetime". Here, someone suggested a CREATE DOMAIN to create an alias for it. Why isn't it provided there out-of-the-box by default? So you have the SQL standard timestamp and the industry standard datetime. and, while $$ is a whole lot better than '', why do we really need these? Why not a normal, simple, begin end block or {}? People in the industry don't like hacks and the open-source world is full of it, though it's getting better. I think this is all valid criticism, but you wanna play deaf, that's up to you guys. cheers and Tom, i don't really want a GUI: psql's use of GNU readline autocompletion is far better than M$'s stupid Query Analizer standard editor and matching it up with vim gets better yet.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: