Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b720a227-3df7-c23e-79e7-61a89eade34e@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-12-30 13:43, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 18:40, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 2020-06-24 20:21, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> On 2020-06-24 10:12, Vik Fearing wrote: >>>> On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>>> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We >>>>> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support >>>>> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are >>>>> equivalent. Here is a trivial patch to add that. >>>> >>>> >>>> The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit >>>> message says "[PATCH 1/2]". What is in the other part? >>> >>> Hehe. The second patch is some in-progress work to add the GRANTED BY >>> clause to the regular GRANT command. More on that perhaps at a later date. >> >> Here is the highly anticipated and quite underwhelming second part of >> this patch set. > > Looks great, but no test to confirm it works. I would suggest adding a > test and committing directly since I don't see any cause for further > discussion. Committed with some tests. Thanks. -- Peter Eisentraut 2ndQuadrant, an EDB company https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: