Cheers for DISTINCT ON
От | Peter Kovacs |
---|---|
Тема | Cheers for DISTINCT ON |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b6e8f2e80801070802n7b04b0e3lbbec1d284bef1f9f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON
Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON |
Список | pgsql-sql |
I just wanted to give my cheers for DISTINCT ON. It is a great feature, I've just found a really good use for it. I am just wondering why it didn't make it into the standards. On a slightly unrelated note, I had the opportunity to work with EQUEL for a short period of time some 15 years ago before I started getting famililar with SQL. I clearly remember the disappointment/surprise I felt as I was struggling to translate some of the constructs I used with EQUEL into SQL. At that time, I thought that (the by then defunct) EQUEL was much more expressive/intuitive/flexible/easier-to-use than SQL. I've been wondering ever since why the worse so often gets the upper-hand over the better. (I am obviously having a hard time "growing-up" :-) ) Cheers, Peter
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: