Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b6b39a46221710e395626ba34740549e@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-12-16 13:49, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > version 13 of the patch. > > 0001-Add-PUBLICATION-catalogs-and-DDL-v13.patch.gz (~32 KB) > 0002-Add-SUBSCRIPTION-catalog-and-DDL-v13.patch.gz (~28 KB) > 0003-Define-logical-rep...utput-plugi-v13.patch.gz (~13 KB) > 0004-Add-logical-replication-workers-v13.patch.gz (~44 KB) > 0005-Add-separate-synch...or-logical--v13.patch.gz (~2 KB) Hi, You wrote on 2016-08-05: : > What's missing: > - sequences, I'd like to have them in 10.0 but I don't have good > way to implement it. PGLogical uses periodical syncing with some > buffer value but that's suboptimal. I would like to decode them > but that has proven to be complicated due to their sometimes > transactional sometimes nontransactional nature, so I probably > won't have time to do it within 10.0 by myself. I ran into problems with sequences and I wonder if sequences-problems are still expected, as the above seems to imply. (short story: I tried to run pgbench across logical replication; and therefore added a sequence to pgbench_history to give it a replica identity, and cannot get it to work reliably ). thanks, Eik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: