Re: wal stats questions
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wal stats questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b5e6e6ee-eed5-42f6-8e9c-b8178cca0655@www.fastmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wal stats questions (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, at 06:42, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2021/04/21 18:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > >> BTW, is it better to change PgStat_Counter from int64 to uint64 because> there aren't any counters with negative number? > > On second thought, it's ok even if the counters like wal_records get overflowed. > Because they are always used to calculate the diff between the previous and > current counters. Even when the current counters are overflowed and > the previous ones are not, WalUsageAccumDiff() seems to return the right > diff of them. If this understanding is right, I'd withdraw my comment and > it's ok to use "long" type for those counters. Thought? Why long? It's of a platform dependent size, which doesn't seem useful here? Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: