Re: Constraint merge and not valid status
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Constraint merge and not valid status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b5e5d627-2fee-46f5-c219-9915416a9196@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Constraint merge and not valid status (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Constraint merge and not valid status
Re: Constraint merge and not valid status |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/07/22 0:38, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Amit Langote > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Consider a scenario where one adds a *valid* constraint on a inheritance >> parent which is then merged with a child table's *not valid* constraint >> during inheritance recursion. If merged, the constraint is not checked >> for the child data even though it may have some. Is that an oversight? > > Seems like it. I'd recommend we just error out in that case and tell > the user that they should validate the child's constraint first. Agreed. Patch attached. In addition to the recursion from parent case, this seems to be broken for the alter table child inherit parent case as well. So, fixed both MergeWithExistingConstraint (called from AddRelationNewConstraints) and MergeConstraintsIntoExisting (called from ATExecAddInherit). I had to add a new argument is_not_valid to the former to signal whether the constraint being propagated itself is declared NOT VALID, in which we can proceed with merging. Also added some tests for both cases. Thanks, Amit
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: