Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b4a4a1d2-cd51-bbc9-27a9-13825cf77184@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 5/6/16 4:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Are you suggesting commiting to still-9.6-HEAD post-beta1? I took > Peter's comment as suggesting that adding the tests would have to wait > til after we branched 9.6, as we do for features. > > I'd really like to have these tests included as that will make them > available to others more easily to add on to, and I'm certainly planning > to continue adding tests until I get pg_dump.c's coverage a lot better. > That seems like the perfect kind of effort that should be happening > right now- adding more tests and working to make sure that what's been > committed is correct (and fixing it when it isn't, as discovered by the > test suite with transforms and casts...). Well, we all want to get our code in and let others make it better. But here we are trying to get a release out in a few days with only a weekend in between, and we are still trying to figure out basic portability issues using build-farm-whacking technology. This is not the time. Again, I applaud this, but this is clearly a new major chunk of mostly not-peer-reviewed code with potential for portability problems and the possibility to break downstream packaging routines. There is no harm in leaving this for 9.7. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: