Re: Roles for pg_basebackup
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Roles for pg_basebackup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b460f2fc-36f4-b5e9-fea1-49f2e26b31a7@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Roles for pg_basebackup (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: Roles for pg_basebackup
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 2020/04/28 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 28 Apr 2020, at 07:22, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >> >> On 2020/04/28 13:37, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>> Based on a recent conversation about backups I had I propose a small tweak to >>>> the pg_basebackup documentation. Listing the user types in the reverse order >>>> from today, putting superuser last, makes it IMO a little clearer that a >>>> REPLICATION role is preferrable to using a superuser for running backups. >>> Makes sense to me. We do that in logical-replication.sgml as well as >>> pg_rewind.sgml (the latter outlines superuser rights last). >> >> Seems there are other documentations having the similar description, >> for example, pg_receivewal.sgml, func.sgml and high-availability.sgml. >> Isn't it better to update also them at the same time? > > That doe make sense. I've updated the places where I think a user configuring > the system might conceivably infer a preference from the order, but have left > the other ones as is. Thanks for updating the patch! It looks good to me. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: