Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73151002030841pc4446d7kee1b80ed0d349a54@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch (Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 2010-02-03 16:53 UTC+2, Robert Haas wrote: >> Some thoughts: >> >> The comments in standard_ExecutorStart() don't do a good job of >> explaining WHY the code does what it does - they just recapitulate >> what you can already see from reading the code. You say "If there are >> DML WITH statements, we always need to use the CID and copy the >> snapshot." That's self-evident from the following code. What's not >> clear is why this is necessary, and the comment doesn't make any >> attempt to explain it. The second half of the if statement has the >> same problem. > > > Right. The documentation in its current state is definitely lacking. > I've tried to focus all the time I have in making this patch technically > good. Outside of documentation issues, where do we stand? Do you need help with the documentation? merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: