Re: SSD + RAID
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSD + RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150911170836t5b69f7edk1e9e7df67af1377b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSD + RAID (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSD + RAID
Re: SSD + RAID Re: SSD + RAID |
Список | pgsql-performance |
2009/11/13 Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>: > As far as what real-world apps have that profile, I like SSDs for small to > medium web applications that have to be responsive, where the user shows up > and wants their randomly distributed and uncached data with minimal latency. > SSDs can also be used effectively as second-tier targeted storage for things > that have a performance-critical but small and random bit as part of a > larger design that doesn't have those characteristics; putting indexes on > SSD can work out well for example (and there the write durability stuff > isn't quite as critical, as you can always drop an index and rebuild if it > gets corrupted). I am right now talking to someone on postgresql irc who is measuring 15k iops from x25-e and no data loss following power plug test. I am becoming increasingly suspicious that peter's results are not representative: given that 90% of bonnie++ seeks are read only, the math doesn't add up, and they contradict broadly published tests on the internet. Has anybody independently verified the results? merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: