Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150911121038i5b9552c3s42770616f44d7165@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sorry, the 128 character limit is simply lame (other than for > unsolvable implementation/performance complexity which I doubt is the > case here), and if that constraint is put in by the implementation, > than the implementation is busted and should be reworked until it's > right. After some reflection, I realized this was an overly strong statement and impolite to the OP. It's easy to yarp from the gallery with the other peanuts :-). It's not the implementation I have an issue with, just the _idea_ that we should be restricted to small payloads for religious reasons...until that came upI was already scheming on how to both extend the patch to be more flexible in terms of payload size, and to backpatch and test it on 8.4 (no point if the community has no interest however). In any event, sorry for the strong words. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: