Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150907270812q69f985f8x73d02a2fd198aa25@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types?
Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: >> We've developed some code to implement fixed-length datatypes for well >> known digest function output (MD5, SHA1 and the various SHA2 types). >> These types have minimal overhead and are quite complete, including >> btree and hash opclasses. > >> We're wondering about proposing them for inclusion in pgcrypto. > > Wasn't this proposed and rejected before? (Or more to the point, > why'd you bother? The advantage over bytea seems negligible.) well, one nice things about the fixed length types is that you can keep your table from needing a toast table when you have a bytea in it. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: