Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150901160648l61e977aek97f0dc18c1421bf0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/16/09, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Andrew Chernow wrote: > > WSACleanup is not really needed during a PQfinish. Its horribly slow if > > the library ref count is 0 and it actually unloads the winsock library, > > adds 225ms to PQfinish. > > Option A will make us leak the reference to it though, won't it? And we > are supposed to clean up after ourselves... > > If you want to override this behavior today, you can just call > WSAStartup() in your application, and it should never happen. Right? > > Now, if we actually had libpq_init()/uninit() or something like it, it > would make sense to move it there. But I'm not sure we want to just leak > the reference. But I'm not entirely convinced either way :-) I think init/uninit is the answer. While writing libpqtypes, we noted that libpq is just plain awkward in a few different ways and probably deserves a rewrite at some point. not today though.... merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: