Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150812080453x13276086n7a662cf04b3b4259@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE
which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine
Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> Dmitry Koterov wrote: >>> Could you please say, if ALTER TYPE ... ADD COLUMN is planned for a future >>> PostgreSQL version? >> >> It is not currently on the TODO list. > > Perhaps we could add it? It's been complained about more than once in > this space. Well, new features that have a perfectly acceptable and usable workaround typically have a fairly low priority of fixing :-) Since tables are basically types, I'm not sure what the difference is between tables and composite types (meaning, why do we have the composite type syntax at all?) I'm not sure if this came up during the design discussion or not. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: