Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150808061133q33083596wd96dbfc948baddf6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/6/08, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote: >> > But the main problem is that if the DROP/CREATE happens, the failure >> > mode is very nasty - you get permanent error on existing backends. >> > (Main case I'm talking about is functions calling other functions.) >> > >> > Some sorta recovery mode would be nice to have, it does not even >> > need function perfectly. Giving error once and then recover would >> > be better than requiring manual action from admin. >> >> sure -- this a known issue --, but the point is that there are not >> that many reasons why you have to drop/create a function if you are >> careful. hiding function prototypes is actually pretty powerful >> although you have to deal with creating the extra types. > > Um. If you are talking about about returning type defined by CREATE TYPE > then you are wrong as changing type requires DROP+CREATE for both type > and function. you missed the point...if your return type is a composite type that is backed by the table (CREATE TABLE, not CREATE TYPE), then you can 'alter' the type by altering the table. This can be done without full drop recreate of the function. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: