Re: HOT - preliminary results
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HOT - preliminary results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150703010835x46c37196w9fa20dcb3c8dc432@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | HOT - preliminary results ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: HOT - preliminary results
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/1/07, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here are some preliminary numbers with the HOT 4.0 patch that I sent > out earlier today. These are only indicative results and should not be > used to judge the performance of HOT in general. I have intentionally > used the setup favorable to HOT. The goal here is to point out the best > usage of HOT so that we get some early feedback about its usefulness. > We still need to run several benchmark tests to see where it would > be useful and where it would add unnecessary overhead without any > real gains. This would also require lot of tuning and would be heavily > dependent on the community feedback/suggestions. I tested HOT patch (currently 3.2) over a wide variety pf pgbench runs and found there to significant improvements (5-40%) in most cases. Generally, I ran fsync=off and stock fillfactor. I'm also a huge believer in HOT once all the kinks get worked out. I had some wierd glitches in earlier versions of the patch which I could not quite figure out and may have been some problems on my end...the new version seems pretty solid except for one possible problem...at one point when I dropped then later added the index on 'abalance', I got spammed 'WARNING: found a HOT-updated tuple' from psql prompt. I was also curious about the 'worst case' of HOT so I added an index on abalance and did some runs. The runs are not quite long enough to remove all volatility from the results but they should be close: **** index on abalance **** [root@mernix ~]# pgbench -c1 -t100000 -p 5000 [HOT] tps = 448.104436 (excluding connections establishing) [root@mernix ~]# pgbench -c1 -t100000 tps = 448.120719 (excluding connections establishing) [root@mernix ~]# pgbench -c10 -t10000 -p 5000 [HOT] tps = 363.444429 (excluding connections establishing) run #1 tps = 415.854569 (excluding connections establishing) run #2 [root@mernix ~]# pgbench -c10 -t10000 tps = 416.659906 (excluding connections establishing) **** no index on abalance **** [root@mernix ~]# pgbench -c10 -t10000 -p 5000 [HOT] tps = 659.870628 (excluding connections establishing) [root@mernix ~]# pgbench -c10 -t10000 tps = 321.889840 (excluding connections establishing) platform is intel pentium D 3ghz, 2xsata 7200rpm software raid0, redhat fc4. This is my dev box which I usually run fsync=off to get comparable performance with production systems and caching raid controller. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: