Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150609111853p38826ff0ncca31784dd7e92a9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 9/11/06, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote: > I'd suggest two things. > > one: Get a better ERP... :) or at least one you can inject some > intelligence into, and two: upgrade to postgresql 8.1, or even 8.2 which > will be released moderately soon, and if you won't be going into > production directly, might be ready about the time you are. for 3 months I ran a 400M$ manufacturing company's erp off of a pre-beta 8.0 windows pg server converted from cobol using some hacked out c++ middleware. I remember having to change how the middleware handled transactions when Alvaro changed them to a checkpoint mechanism. I also remember being relieved when I no longer had to manually edit pg_config.h so nobody would notice they would notice they were running a beta version of postgresql had one of the technical people casually logged into psql. I scraped out almost completely unscathed except for a nasty crash due to low stack allocation of the compiler on windows. the point of all this? get onto a recent version of postgresql, what could possbily go wrong? merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: