Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150608090926j2d328188x6f2f6ecb9177da0e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 (Kenji Morishige <kenjim@juniper.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 8/9/06, Kenji Morishige <kenjim@juniper.net> wrote: > I have unlimited rack space, so 2U is not the issue. The boxes are stored in > our lab for internal software tools. I'm going to research those boxes you > mention. Regarding the JBOD enclosures, are these generally just 2U or 4U > units with SCSI interface connectors? I didn't see these types of boxes > availble on Dell website, I'll look again. > -Kenji > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:35:22AM +0200, Arjen van der Meijden wrote: > > With such a budget you should easily be able to get something like: > > - A 1U high-performance server (for instance the Dell 1950 with 2x > > Woodcrest 5160, 16GB of FB-Dimm memory, one 5i and one 5e perc raid > > controller and some disks internally) > > - An external SAS direct attached disks storage enclosure full with 15k > > rpm 36GB disks (for instance the MD1000, with 15x 36GB 15k disks) > > > > Going for the dell-solution would set you back "only" (including > > savings) about $13-$14k. HP offers a similar solutions (a HP DL360G5 or > > a DL380G5/DL385 with two MSA50's for instance) which also fit in your > > budget afaik. The other players tend to be (a bit) more expensive, force > > you to go with Fibre Channel or "ancient" SCSI external storage ;) > > > > If you'd like to have a product by a generic vendor, have a look at the > > Adaptec JS50 SAS Jbod enclosure or Promise's Vtrak 300 (both offer 12 > > sas/sata bays in 2U) for storage. I am really curious about the Adaptec SAS product to see what it can do. If you don't know what SAS is, it is Sata Attached SCSI. SAS cables use 4 sata lanes (3gb/sec each) bonded together in a single cable. The raid is handled with via the raid controller or the o/s in a software configuration. SAS is the evolution of SCSI and I think will ultimately replace scsi in enterprise setups becuase it is faster, cheaper, and more flexible. SAS enclosures generally accept sata or sas drives in mix/match configurations. so, you get to choose between cheap, large, 7200 rpm sata drives or small, expensive sas 10k or 15k rpm drives *in the same enclosure*. You also get a compromise drive in the form of the raptor which is 10k rpm sata drive. You could buy a 2u 12 drive SAS encloure (3000$), 12 150g raptors (3000$) and spend another grand on cables/controller and have a hellishly performing raid system for the money assuming sas performs like it does on paper. note that i would not be trying this with my own money unless I was guaranteed a money back rma for a 30 day evaluation period. that would leave you with 12 grand or so to pick up a quad (8 core) opeteron if you bought it right. regards, merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: