Re: is it possible to make this faster?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is it possible to make this faster? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150605252147h218ec25ci183283334731adbd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: is it possible to make this faster? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: is it possible to make this faster?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 5/25/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > >> recent versions of mysql do much better, returning same set in < 20ms. > Are you sure you measured that right? I tried to duplicate this using > mysql 5.0.21, and I see runtimes of 0.45 sec without an index and > 0.15 sec with. This compares to psql times around 0.175 sec. Doesn't > look to me like we're hurting all that badly, even without using the > index. Well, my numbers were approximate, but I tested on a few different machines. the times got closer as the cpu speed got faster. pg really loves a quick cpu. on 600 mhz p3 I got 70ms on mysql and 1050ms on pg. Mysql query cache is always off for my performance testing. My a and b columns were ID columns from another table, so I rewrote the join and now pg is smoking mysql (again). To quickly answer the other questions: 1. no, not testing innodb 2, rows are narrow Merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: