Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
От | Claus Guttesen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b41c75520705080122q58b36e36x21f6147ae5adaa81@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2 (david@lang.hm) |
Ответы |
Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> > In #postgresql on freenode, somebody ever mentioned that ZFS from Solaris > > helps a lot to the performance of pgsql, so dose anyone have information > > about that? > > the filesystem you use will affect the performance of postgres > significantly. I've heard a lot of claims for ZFS, unfortunantly many of > them from people who have prooven that they didn't know what they were > talking about by the end of their first or second e-mails. > > much of the hype for ZFS is it's volume management capabilities and admin > tools. Linux has most (if not all) of the volume management capabilities, > it just seperates them from the filesystems so that any filesystem can use > them, and as a result you use one tool to setup your RAID, one to setup > snapshots, and a third to format your filesystems where ZFS does this in > one userspace tool. Even though those posters may have proven them selves wrong, zfs is still a very handy fs and it should not be judged relative to these statements. > once you seperate the volume management piece out, the actual performance > question is a lot harder to answer. there are a lot of people who say that > it's far faster then the alternate filesystems on Solaris, but I haven't > seen any good comparisons between it and Linux filesystems. One could install pg on solaris 10 and format the data-area as ufs and then as zfs and compare import- and query-times and other benchmarking but comparing ufs/zfs to Linux-filesystems would also be a comparison of those two os'es. -- regards Claus
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: