Re: meson: Non-feature feature options
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: meson: Non-feature feature options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b3a62229-f2bb-a47f-f165-4176b8f44069@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: meson: Non-feature feature options (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: meson: Non-feature feature options
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 22.03.23 11:16, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 11:12, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >> On 14.03.23 15:07, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: >>>> I think the uuid side of this is making this way too complicated. I'm >>>> content leaving this as a manual option for now. >>>> >>>> There is much more value in making the ssl option work automatically. >>>> So I would welcome a patch that just makes -Dssl=auto work smoothly, >>>> perhaps using the "trick" that Andres described. >>> I tried to implement what we did for ssl to uuid as well, do you have >>> any comments? >> >> For the uuid option, we have three different choices. What should be >> the search order and why? > > Docs [1] say that: OSSP uuid library is not well maintained, and is > becoming increasingly difficult to port to newer platforms; so we can > put 'uuid-ossp' to the end. Between 'uuid-e2fs' and 'uuid-bsd', I > believe 'uuid-e2fs' is used more often than 'uuid-bsd'. > Hence, they can be ordered as 'uuid-e2fs', 'uuid-bsd', 'uuid-ossp'. > > Does that make sense? I think that's fair.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: