Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?

On 2024-05-12 Su 18:05, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:26 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> Well, this is more or less where I came in back in about 2002 :-) I've been trying to help support it ever since,
mainlymotivated by stubborn persistence than anything else. Still, I agree that the lack of support for the Windows
portfrom Microsoft over the years has been more than disappointing.
 
> I think "state of the Windows port" would make a good discussion topic
> at pgconf.dev (with write-up for those who can't be there).  If there
> is interest, I could organise that with a short presentation of the
> issues I am aware of so far and possible improvements and
> smaller-things-we-could-drop-instead-of-dropping-the-whole-port.  I
> would focus on technical stuff, not who-should-be-doing-what, 'cause I
> can't make anyone do anything.
>

+1


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com