Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b333354b-9aa4-7721-807e-7da81c309529@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/04/07 3:03, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2021/04/06 23:01, Fujii Masao wrote: >> >> >> On 2021/04/06 20:44, David Steele wrote: >>> On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote: >>>>> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced, >>>>> but it was not necessary. >>>>> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence. >>>> >>>> So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch? >>>> If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version atfirst. >>>> Then we can improve the docs if required. >>> >>> +1 >> >> Thanks! So I pushed the patch. > > The buildfarm members "drongo" and "fairywren" reported that the regression test (024_archive_recovery.pl) commit 9de9294b0cadded failed with the following error. ISTM the cause of this failure is that the test calls $node->init() without"allows_streaming => 1" and which doesn't add pg_hba.conf entry for TCP/IP connection from pg_basebackup. So I thinkthat the attached patch needs to be applied. Pushed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: