Re: dblink Future support vs FDW
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dblink Future support vs FDW |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b2bc5ffe-4b00-4266-9f86-fc25309e62f1@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | dblink Future support vs FDW (Dhritman Roy <dhritman.roy@NetCracker.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 6/27/24 08:32, Dhritman Roy wrote: > Hello, > > This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL. > > I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( > it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously > do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few > months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new > version. I would say that is highly unlikely. Even if it where to happen at some point in the distant future you still have: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=tree;f=contrib/dblink;h=03de20165973a346e2ce8e3c7fdfb11448487dd6;hb=HEAD Open source code under a permissive license that you could keep running with. > > Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful > for us and highly appreciated. > > Regards > > ROY. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, > proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, > this information by persons or entities other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact > the sender and delete the material from any computer. > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: