Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b2803a54-41c8-9400-c29c-6f6672509b9c@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/07/2017 05:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: >> 1) commit the 0002 patch now before the feature freeze and follow up >> with the regression test patch when ready in a couple of days >> 2) hold off on both patches until ready >> 3) push both patches to the next commitfest/pg11 >> >> Some argue this is an open issue against the new partitioning feature in >> pg10 and therefore should be addressed now, and others do not. I can see >> both sides of that argument. >> >> In any case, thoughts on what to do? > > Speaking only for myself, I'm OK with any of those options, provided > that that "a couple" means what my dictionary says it means. Thanks. I'd prefer not to do #1 actually, and I think we can adhere to the dictionary meaning of "a couple" (i.e. by EOD Sunday). Assuming we are ready by Sunday I will push both together (#2) or else I will move them both together to the next CF (#3). Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: